Skip to main content

SQF Edition 10 audits start January 2027. Is your program ready? Learn more →

FSVP

Answer the FSVP inspection from an organized file

FDA inspects FSVP by asking you, the importer, to produce the program for a given food and supplier. A real FSVP is scoped, documented, and kept current, so that request is answered from an organized file instead of a scramble through inboxes and shared drives.

Are you the FSVP importer? If you are the US owner or consignee of the food at entry, or the designated US agent when there is no US owner, the program is yours to hold. Settling that is step one of the work.

Not ready for a call? Send your supplier list and we'll tell you what an inspection would pull first.

What it requires

Scope, evaluate, verify, and keep the file

An FSVP runs from importer scope through the verification record. An FDA inspection reads all four, and records only help the importer who can produce them on the day they're asked for.

Audit checklist 4 / 4

FSVP scope and importer status in Beacon

Before anything else, we confirm who the FSVP importer is for each entry and which imported foods fall in scope. Getting this wrong means the wrong party holds the program. Scoping sets the boundaries the rest of the work fits inside.

Explore Scope and Importer Status

Hazard analysis and supplier evaluation in Beacon

A hazard analysis for each imported food, paired with an evaluation of the supplier and the risk the food poses. The pairing is what sets the right verification activity. A high-risk hazard from a less-proven supplier calls for more than a certificate on file.

Explore Hazard Analysis and Supplier Evaluation

Supplier verification activities and COA records in Beacon

Supplier verification can mean an on-site audit, a review of the supplier's food safety records, or testing, chosen to match the hazard and documented. We send the questionnaires, collect the audit reports, and track the certificates of analysis the program relies on.

Explore Verification Activities

FSVP records and re-evaluation tracking in Beacon

The written procedures, the verification results, and the re-evaluation schedule, organized by supplier and food so an inspection request is answered quickly. Re-evaluation runs at least every three years, and sooner on a trigger, with due dates tracked so nothing lapses.

Explore Records and Re-evaluation
The process

From scope to an inspection-ready file

Standing up an FSVP takes a few weeks of scoping and documentation, then a re-evaluation rhythm to keep. We scope the program, run the hazard analysis, set the verification activities, and organize the records. The platform then holds them so an inspection request is answered fast.

Start with a scoping review
1

Scope the program

1 week

Confirm the FSVP importer for each entry and which imported foods are in scope. The boundary everything else fits inside.

2

Run the hazard analysis

1-2 weeks

Analyze the hazards for each imported food and evaluate each supplier and the risk the food poses. The pairing that drives verification.

3

Set verification activities

1-2 weeks

Choose an on-site audit, record review, or testing to match each hazard, and document why. The choice has to be justified, not assumed.

4

Collect the evidence

2-4 weeks

Send the supplier questionnaires, gather audit reports, and track certificates of analysis, organized by supplier and food.

5

Write the procedures

1 week

Document the written FSVP procedures and the re-evaluation schedule, so the program is a defined system, not a pile of records.

6

Maintain and re-evaluate

ongoing

Track re-evaluation dates, respond to triggers, and keep the file inspection-ready, so the next FDA request is a five-minute pull, not a fire drill.

Verification activities

Three ways to verify a supplier.

The rule lets you choose, as long as the activity matches the hazard and the choice is documented. These are the three the program builds around.

1

On-site audit

The higher-assurance route

An annual audit of the supplier, required when there is a hazard with a reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences, unless you document a justified alternative.

2

Record review

Documented performance

Reviewing the supplier's relevant food safety records, often paired with a questionnaire, to verify the hazard is controlled at the source.

3

Sampling and testing

Direct evidence

Testing the imported food, with certificates of analysis tracked against each lot, where the hazard and the supplier history make testing the right fit.

Choosing the right activity is where the program is won or lost. Send us your supplier list and we'll tell you which activity each one needs.

Who leads it

Our FSVP and supplier work is led by a former SQF Lead Auditor who has sat on the asking side of a supplier-verification review thousands of times and knows exactly which records an FDA FSVP inspection pulls first. Meet Jeff.

7,500+ audits on the bench Audit-side since 1977 1 working SQF plant
Beacon Platform

Your FSVP records live in Beacon. Ready for the inspection request.

The supplier records, questionnaires, audit reports, and certificates of analysis live in Beacon, organized by supplier and food, with re-evaluation dates tracked so a due supplier is flagged. When the inspector asks for a program, the file is already assembled. See how the supply chain module works.

Supplier records by food and entity
Questionnaires sent and collected
Audit report storage
Certificate of analysis tracking
Hazard analysis documentation
Written FSVP procedures
Re-evaluation date tracking
Inspection-ready file assembly
Beacon supplier-records dashboard

Any consultant can write your FSVP procedures. The difference is whether the file is still organized and current the day an inspector actually asks for it. See why teams build it with us.

Build an FSVP that produces the file when FDA asks

Bring your supplier list and the foods you import. In 20 minutes you'll know whether your file would survive an FDA inspection request and where the gaps are.

Prefer the phone? (313) 484-4887

What happens next

01

Discovery call

About your facility and goals. Not a sales pitch.

02

See it in action

A live walkthrough of Beacon scoped to your operation.

03

Custom proposal

Software, consulting, and training sized to your facility.

You'll talk with a food safety expert, not a sales rep.

20 minutes · No commitment · No pressure

Start with your suppliers

Send us your supplier list

Send the foods you import and the suppliers behind them. We come back with the records an FDA inspection would ask for and the gaps in your file, before you decide whether a call is worth your time.

A read on which records an inspection pulls first
Where a missing verification would stall the file
No commitment. Just a conversation
FAQ

FSVP questions, answered

Common questions from importers building or maintaining an FSVP.

The Foreign Supplier Verification Programs rule is the part of FSMA that makes the importer responsible for verifying that food brought into the United States meets US safety standards. If you are the importer of record, or the US owner or consignee at the time of entry, you almost certainly need an FSVP. It applies to a wide range of imported food, and the FDA inspects it by asking the importer to produce the program.
The FSVP importer is the US owner or consignee of the food at the time of entry. If there is no US owner or consignee, it is the US agent or representative of the foreign owner, designated in writing. Getting this right matters, because the importer is the party FDA holds responsible and the party who must have the program ready to show. Part of scoping is confirming who actually carries that obligation.
At its core: a hazard analysis for each imported food, an evaluation of the foreign supplier's performance and the risk the food poses, supplier verification activities matched to that risk, and the records that document all of it. Verification activities can include an on-site audit of the supplier, reviewing the supplier's food safety records, or testing, depending on the hazard. The program ties each activity back to the hazard it addresses.
The rule lists several: an annual on-site audit of the supplier (required when there is a hazard with a reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences, unless you document why another activity is appropriate), reviewing the supplier's relevant food safety records, sampling and testing, or other procedures you can justify. The activity has to match the hazard and the supplier's risk, and the choice has to be documented, not assumed.
The hazard analysis, the supplier evaluation, the verification activities and their results (audit reports, reviewed records, certificates of analysis), the written procedures, and the records that show you re-evaluate suppliers on a defined schedule. An FDA FSVP inspection is largely a records review: the inspector asks the importer to produce the program for a given food and supplier, so the records have to be organized and retrievable, not scattered.
At least every three years, and sooner if you become aware of new information about a hazard or the supplier's performance. A new finding, a complaint, or a change in the supplier's process is a trigger to re-evaluate before the three-year mark. A program that sets the suppliers up once and never revisits them drifts out of compliance quietly, which is why the re-evaluation cadence is part of the design.
Beacon holds your supplier records, the questionnaires you send and collect, the audit reports, and the certificates of analysis the program relies on, organized by supplier and food so an inspection request is answered in minutes, not days. Re-evaluation dates are tracked so a supplier due for review is flagged. See how Beacon handles supply chain and supplier records.