Skip to main content

SQF Edition 10 audits start January 2027. Is your program ready? Learn more →

BRCGS Certification

Get BRCGS Issue 9 ready, fundamentals first

A customer named BRCGS in their supplier requirements. Issue 9 is built around fundamentals, the clauses so central that a single major finding against one can block your certificate, and it publishes your grade where buyers can see it. Already SQF or FSSC certified? Most of your program carries over; the work is re-mapping it to the BRCGS clause structure. Led by a GFSI-experienced lead auditor.

What it requires

Issue 9 is a clause structure, not a checklist

BRCGS certifies a working food safety management system against a detailed clause set. These are four pillars an auditor checks, several of them fundamental, and the four Beacon keeps dated and filed against the clause they answer.

Audit checklist 4 / 4

Management review and food safety culture records in Beacon

BRCGS opens with leadership. The standard expects documented commitment, resources, a food safety culture plan, and management review with evidence that leadership acts on what the system surfaces. This is a fundamental clause, and Issue 9 reads it closely.

Explore Senior Management Commitment

HACCP plan management in Beacon

A documented hazard analysis built on Codex principles, validated control points, and monitoring that proves each one is in control. The HACCP plan is a fundamental requirement, so a major non-conformity here blocks the certificate regardless of your overall grade.

Explore HACCP and the Food Safety Plan

Document control and SOPs in Beacon

Site standards, product control, process control, and the personnel and prerequisite programs that BRCGS expects to be documented, current, and controlled. The standard wants version history that shows what governed any process on any given day, not a stack of undated SOPs.

Explore Prerequisites and Document Control

Internal audit, corrective action, and traceability tracking in Beacon

Three more fundamentals. A scheduled internal audit program, a corrective and preventive action process with root cause, and a traceability exercise that runs forward and back within the window the standard sets. BRCGS judges the closed loop, not just the finding.

Explore Internal Audit, CAPA, Traceability
The process

From gap assessment to certificate

Most first-time facilities reach a certified grade in 6 to 9 months. Facilities already certified to SQF or FSSC move faster, since most of the program already exists and the work is re-mapping to the BRCGS clauses. Either way, every record we build lives inside Beacon, dated and filed against the clause it answers.

Start with a gap assessment
1

Gap assessment

1-2 weeks

Walk the site against the Issue 9 clauses, flag the fundamentals at risk, and produce a corrective action list with owners. The honest starting point.

2

Build the program

3-6 months

The biggest piece. HACCP plan, prerequisite programs, SOPs, and the management commitment records, built straight into the platform against the BRCGS structure.

3

Implement and train

1-3 months

Run the program on the floor, train the team, and collect enough operating history to show the system runs, including a full traceability exercise.

4

Choose a certification body

1-2 weeks

Select a BRCGS-licensed certification body and decide announced or unannounced. The CB is independent. We can recommend, the choice is yours.

5

Certification audit

1-3 days

A 1 to 3 day on-site audit: document review, facility inspection, and staff interviews, with non-conformities raised by type and severity.

6

Grade and maintain

ongoing

Close the non-conformities, earn the grade, then keep the program audit-ready year-round, so an unannounced auditor finds the same clean system you certified on.

Grading

Your grade is a number your buyers can see.

BRCGS grades the audit on the count and type of non-conformities, and publishes the result in its directory. Where you land depends on how cleanly the program runs.

AA

Top grades

The result buyers like to see

Grades AA and A reflect few or only minor non-conformities. They signal a program that runs clean day to day, which is exactly what a readiness engagement aims for.

B

Certified, with work

A passing grade with majors

Grades in the middle band still certify, but they carry majors that must be closed and reflect gaps a buyer can read in the directory. The goal is to move up, not just to pass.

!

No certificate

When a fundamental fails

A single critical non-conformity, or a major against a fundamental clause, can mean no certificate that cycle. This is why readiness work spends extra time on the fundamentals before the auditor arrives.

Where you would grade today depends on how the fundamentals actually run, not how they read on paper. Tell us where your program stands and we will read it back to you.

Who leads it

Our BRCGS work is led by a former SQF Lead Auditor who reads the GFSI standards from the auditor's chair and knows which fundamental clauses decide a grade. Meet Jeff.

7,500+ audits on the bench Audit-side since 1977 1 working SQF plant
Beacon Platform

Your BRCGS program lives in Beacon. Ready for the clause the auditor opens to.

Everything we build during readiness stays inside Beacon: organized, version-controlled, and open to your whole team. When the audit arrives, the evidence against each clause is already filed. See how the audits module works.

HACCP plan management
Prerequisite program documentation
Monitoring forms on tablets
Corrective action with root cause
Internal audit scheduling
Traceability records
Management review records
Audit packet assembly
Beacon BRCGS audit packet with sealed manifest and checksum

You can get BRCGS-ready with any consultant. The difference shows the day an auditor asks for evidence against a clause, and it is either already filed or scrambled for. See why teams build it with us.

Get BRCGS Issue 9 ready with a team that reads the clauses for a living

Bring your customer's BRCGS requirement. In 20 minutes you'll know which fundamentals already hold up and which need work before you book an audit date.

Prefer the phone? (313) 484-4887

What happens next

01

Discovery call

About your facility and goals. Not a sales pitch.

02

See it in action

A live walkthrough of Beacon scoped to your operation.

03

Custom proposal

Software, consulting, and training sized to your facility.

You'll talk with a food safety expert, not a sales rep.

20 minutes · No commitment · No pressure

Prefer to start in writing?

Tell us about your facility

Send the basics and we come to the call already knowing which scheme you run today, which customer named BRCGS, and roughly where the fundamentals stand.

A read on which fundamentals are already solid
Gap assessment mapped to the Issue 9 clauses
No commitment. Just a conversation
FAQ

BRCGS Issue 9 questions, answered

Common questions from manufacturers certifying to the BRCGS standard.

BRCGS is a GFSI-benchmarked food safety standard, and Issue 9 is the current version of the Food Safety standard, in force since February 2023. If a customer (often a UK or European retailer, or a US buyer who runs a BRC program) names BRCGS in their supplier requirements, you certify to it. It sits alongside SQF and FSSC 22000 as one of the GFSI schemes a manufacturer can be audited against.
Every engagement is scoped, and three things set the effort: how much of a GFSI program you already run, your facility size, and your timeline. A site already certified to SQF or FSSC needs far less build than one starting from no scheme at all, since most of the food safety plan and prerequisite programs carry over and the work is largely re-mapping to the BRCGS clauses. After a discovery call and a gap assessment you get a specific number for your facility, not a rate-card guess. BRCGS registration and the certification body's audit fees are separate, paid directly to those organizations.
Because a customer asked for it. Both are GFSI-benchmarked, so both satisfy a buyer who wants "a GFSI certification," but some buyers, particularly UK and European retailers, name BRCGS specifically. If yours did, the good news is that most of your SQF program carries over: the HACCP plan, prerequisite programs, and monitoring records already exist, and the work is re-mapping them to the BRCGS clause structure and closing the gaps where Issue 9 reads differently. It is a re-map, not a rebuild.
BRCGS issues a grade based on the number and type of non-conformities raised at audit, from AA down through unclassified, with announced and unannounced audit options. A single critical non-conformity, or too many majors, can mean no certificate that cycle. Your grade is visible to customers in the BRCGS Directory, so it is not just pass or fail, it is a number your buyers can see.
BRCGS marks certain clauses as fundamental: requirements so central that a major non-conformity against any one of them blocks certification regardless of your overall score. The senior management commitment clause, the HACCP plan, internal audit, corrective and preventive action, traceability, and others sit in this group. A readiness engagement spends extra time making sure the fundamentals are not just present but demonstrable.
BRCGS offers both. The unannounced program can earn a higher-visibility result with some buyers, but it means the auditor can arrive inside a set window with no warning, so the program has to be audit-ready on a random Tuesday, not just the week you prepared. Most facilities start on the announced route for their first cycle and consider unannounced once the program runs cleanly day to day.
A facility starting from no GFSI program should plan 6 to 9 months: gap assessment, program build, implementation, and enough operating history to show the system runs. A facility already certified to SQF or FSSC moves faster, because the food safety plan and most prerequisite programs already exist and the work is largely re-mapping to the BRCGS clause structure.
Beacon holds the documents, HACCP plan, monitoring records, internal audit schedule, and corrective actions your BRCGS program runs on, with version history that shows exactly what was in force on any date. When your auditor asks for evidence against a clause, the record is already filed, dated, and attributed instead of scattered across a shared drive. See how Beacon handles audits and audit packets.